Openings at the poles or is it fiction?

Much has been written and said about a subject like this, full of passion for his followers and successes and ravings of its detractors, particularly know little of it because I considered it an unscientific topic, I just called the attention. But in recent months, where my view was more focused on following a comet called Lula green and researching about satellites that flood our atmosphere, I noticed some curious behavior of some of the planets of our system that motivated me to this analysis which I share with you. 

Let's start by differentiating the magnetic poles of the geographic poles, the first starts at the Earth's core and expands into outer space and is point ¨ ¨ physical, either north or south, which coincides with the axis of planetary rotation. Other existing poles in the North and South are:
 1 - The Geomagnetic Pole, point of intersection of the surface of the earth with the axes of the present Earth's magnetic field. 

2 - The Celestial Pole, pointing imaginary point where the Earth's rotation axis. 

3 - The Pole of Inaccessibility, the point at both ends of the planet away from all the surrounding land and inaccessible (why?). Note that there are few expeditions are launched to find these points. 

In the South Pole of Inaccessibility there is controversy about its actual location and there are various different coordinates depending on the criteria to find it (?) And the North pole of inaccessibility drifting polar ice sheets can point any permanent structure (?). Note that the compass does not point to the geographic North Pole but the north magnetic pole, defined as the place where the magnetic field is perpendicular to the surface, so that in high latitudes are quite imprecise. In short, if you decide to go to the North Pole will take anything you compass. 

Now, why did not match the magnetic poles and geographic poles? Now, all scientifically solid spheres with two poles at the end of its axis, and a magnetic core that behaves like a magnet, the magnetic poles should coincide with its geographic poles. This is what it should be if we take into accounting the laws of physics. Also due to the accumulation of ferromagnetic materials (like iron) inside and movement relative differential over other layers, the resulting magnetic field intensity would have so much mass that would draw all the planets in the system, and may be heavier than the sun. 

Noting the global behavior of the planets in our system we realize that any celestial body has such a magnetic force inside (except for the black holes attract all towards them), on the contrary, it expands, moves away as some point our honeymoon will go away from us, astronomically speaking comes naturally. 

The reason that the magnetic and geographic poles do not coincide is that, while the magnetic pole is on and along the edge of the polar opening, the geographic center is in the air, not on solid ground. The true magnetic pole and center of gravity is a point in the center of the earth's crust, which is 650 kilometers deep, and runs along the opening (?). 

For this reason, the compass needle is pointed vertically downwards when passing the edge of the opening and enters it. Only after passing the center, the needle would point straight up instead of down. In both cases, after reaching the edge of the polar opening, the compass no longer works horizontally as before, but vertical. All Arctic explorers who came to such high latitudes made the same observation, and always disconcerting. 

One of the most enigmatic of Arctic exploration is that, although it is an area of ​​ocean covered by water, which freezes over or is open in parts (depending on season) many explorers indicate that large areas of open ocean at points closest to the pole, while further south there is more ice. 

Some scouts said it was very hot at times and that should take off their coats. This is explained by the north wind in the Arctic becomes warmer as one sails north beyond the latitude of 70 degrees. But to be fair, in a solid sphere, neither science nor reason can provide a rational theory of why it's hotter as you move north (?). 

William L. Blessing tells us about "The earth is not a true sphere. It is flattened at the poles, or perhaps I should say, begins to flatten at the poles. The pole is just the outer edge of a magnetic circle, where the magnetic needle of the compass points down. As the earth rotates on its axis, the motion is gyroscopic. The gyroscopic pole magnetic outer edge is a circle. Beyond the border, the land flattens and tilts gradually as a gun inside. The real pole in the exact center of the cone is perpendicular, as this point is the exact center of the opening from the inside (?). We must also discard the old idea that the more deeply it penetrates the earth hotter it is. " 

Looking at the pictures "real" of the various planets around our sun (not retouched photos with a black halo around them almost perfect but real pictures of telescopes used) we realize that most of the poles of all the planets are flat, however surprised to see that the official photos found online images show diffuse sheets at the poles. Polar Auroras ¿? 

All explorers who have been near Earth's poles have written about the majesty of the aurora borealis, but we know scientifically occurs: the Sun, located 150 million km from Earth, is continuously emitting charged particles: protons, positively charged and electrons negatively charged. That flow of particles is the so-called solar wind. In the vicinity of the Earth, the solar wind is deflected by the Earth's magnetic field or magnetosphere. Trapped particles in the magnetosphere collide with atoms and molecules in Earth's atmosphere, typically oxygen (O) and nitrogen (N), the energy input provided by the particles disturbs these atoms and molecules, leading to excited states which return energy such as light energy. That light is what we see from the ground and called auroras. 

Strange that being so normal process does not occur elsewhere in the world where there are the same conditions, only at the poles. It is also very strange to see these events on other planets like Jupiter and Saturn, which have no air or oxygen, essential in the formation of these astronomical phenomena. We cannot say it is due to the magnetic field of these large planets similar situation occurs for Mars, which lacks a magnetic field similar to Earth. Unless we begin to rely on theories such as Dr. Marshall B. Gardner, who assures us those auroras are merely reflections of light emitted by planets from within.